LISA RENEE: “The Military Origins of Facebook”

“Facebook’s growing role in the ever-expanding surveillance and ‘pre-crime’ apparatus of the national security state demands new scrutiny of the company’s origins and its products as they relate to a former, controversial DARPA-run surveillance program that was essentially analogous to what is currently the world’s largest social network.”

~Whitney Webb


Facebook’s growing role in the ever-expanding surveillance and ‘pre-crime’ apparatus of the national security state demands new scrutiny of the company’s origins and its products as they relate to a former, controversial DARPA-run surveillance program that was essentially analogous to what is currently the world’s largest social network.

In mid-February, Daniel Baker, a US veteran described by the media as “anti-Trump, anti-government, anti-white supremacists, and anti-police,” was charged by a Florida grand jury with two counts of “transmitting a communication in interstate commerce containing a threat to kidnap or injure.”

The communication in question had been posted by Baker on Facebook, where he had created an event page to organize an armed counter-rally to one planned by Donald Trump supporters at the Florida capital of Tallahassee on January 6. “If you are afraid to die fighting the enemy, then stay in bed and live. Call all of your friends and Rise Up!,” Baker had written on his Facebook event page.

Baker’s case is notable as it is one of the first “precrime” arrests based entirely on social media posts—the logical conclusion of the Trump administration’s, and now Biden administration’s, push to normalize arresting individuals for online posts to prevent violent acts before they can happen. From the increasing sophistication of US intelligence/military contractor Palantir’s predictive policing programs to the formal announcement of the Justice Department’s Disruption and Early Engagement Program in 2019 to Biden’s first budget, which contains $111 million for pursuing and managing “increasing domestic terrorism caseloads,” the steady advance toward a precrime-centered “war on domestic terror” has been notable under every post-9/11 presidential administration.

This new so-called war on domestic terror has actually resulted in many of these types of posts on Facebook. And, while Facebook has long sought to portray itself as a “town square” that allows people from across the world to connect, a deeper look into its apparently military origins and continual military connections reveals that the world’s largest social network was always intended to act as a surveillance tool to identify and target domestic dissent.

Part 1 of this two-part series on Facebook and the US national-security state explores the social media network’s origins and the timing and nature of its rise as it relates to a controversial military program that was shut down the same day that Facebook launched. The program, known as LifeLog, was one of several controversial post-9/11 surveillance programs pursued by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) that threatened to destroy privacy and civil liberties in the United States while also seeking to harvest data for producing “humanized” artificial intelligence (AI). 

As this report will show, Facebook is not the only Silicon Valley giant whose origins coincide closely with this same series of DARPA initiatives and whose current activities are providing both the engine and the fuel for a hi-tech war on domestic dissent.

DARPA’s Data Mining for “National Security” and to “Humanize” AI

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, DARPA, in close collaboration with the US intelligence community (specifically the CIA), began developing a “precrime” approach to combatting terrorism known as Total Information Awareness or TIA. The purpose of TIA was to develop an “all-seeing” military-surveillance apparatus. The official logic behind TIA was that invasive surveillance of the entire US population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks, bioterrorism events, and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks. 

The architect of TIA, and the man who led it during its relatively brief existence, was John Poindexter, best known for being Ronald Reagan’s National Security Advisor during the Iran-Contra affair and for being convicted of five felonies in relation to that scandal. A less well-known activity of Iran-Contra figures like Poindexter and Oliver North was their development of the Main Core database to be used in “continuity of government” protocols. Main Core was used to compile a list of US dissidents and “potential troublemakers” to be dealt with if the COG protocols were ever invoked. These protocols could be invoked for a variety of reasons, including widespread public opposition to a US military intervention abroad, widespread internal dissent, or a vaguely defined moment of “national crisis” or “time of panic.” Americans were not informed if their name was placed on the list, and a person could be added to the list for merely having attended a protest in the past, for failing to pay taxes, or for other, “often trivial,” behaviors deemed “unfriendly” by its architects in the Reagan administration. 

In light of this, it was no exaggeration when New York Times columnist William Safire remarked that, with TIA, “Poindexter is now realizing his twenty-year dream: getting the ‘data-mining’ power to snoop on every public and private act of every American.”

The TIA program met with considerable citizen outrage after it was revealed to the public in early 2003. TIA’s critics included the American Civil Liberties Union, which claimed that the surveillance effort would “kill privacy in America” because “every aspect of our lives would be catalogued,” while several mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “fighting terror by terrifying US citizens.” As a result of the pressure, DARPA changed the program’s name to Terrorist Information Awareness to make it sound less like a national-security panopticon and more like a program aiming specifically at terrorists in the post-9/11 era. 

The TIA projects were not actually closed down, however, with most moved to the classified portfolios of the Pentagon and US intelligence community. Some became intelligence funded and guided private-sector endeavors, such as Peter Thiel’s Palantir, while others resurfaced years later under the guise of combatting the COVID-19 crisis. 

Soon after TIA was initiated, a similar DARPA program was taking shape under the direction of a close friend of Poindexter’s, DARPA program manager Douglas Gage. Gage’s project, LifeLog, sought to “build a database tracking a person’s entire existence” that included an individual’s relationships and communications (phone calls, mail, etc.), their media-consumption habits, their purchases, and much more in order to build a digital record of “everything an individual says, sees, or does.” LifeLog would then take this unstructured data and organize it into “discreet episodes” or snapshots while also “mapping out relationships, memories, events and experiences.”

LifeLog, per Gage and supporters of the program, would create a permanent and searchable electronic diary of a person’s entire life, which DARPA argued could be used to create next-generation “digital assistants” and offer users a “near-perfect digital memory.” Gage insisted, even after the program was shut down, that individuals would have had “complete control of their own data-collection efforts” as they could “decide when to turn the sensors on or off and decide who will share the data.” In the years since then, analogous promises of user control have been made by the tech giants of Silicon Valley, only to be broken repeatedly for profit and to feed the government’s domestic-surveillance apparatus.

The information that LifeLog gleaned from an individual’s every interaction with technology would be combined with information obtained from a GPS transmitter that tracked and documented the person’s location, audio-visual sensors that recorded what the person saw and said, as well as biomedical monitors that gauged the person’s health. Like TIA, LifeLog was promoted by DARPA as potentially supporting “medical research and the early detection of an emerging epidemic.”

Critics in mainstream media outlets and elsewhere were quick to point out that the program would inevitably be used to build profiles on dissidents as well as suspected terrorists. Combined with TIA’s surveillance of individuals at multiple levels, LifeLog went farther by “adding physical information (like how we feel) and media data (like what we read) to this transactional data.” One critic, Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned at the time that the programs that DARPA was pursuing, including LifeLog, “have obvious, easy paths to Homeland Security deployments.” 

At the time, DARPA publicly insisted that LifeLog and TIA were not connected, despite their obvious parallels, and that LifeLog would not be used for “clandestine surveillance.” However, DARPA’s own documentation on LifeLog noted that the project “will be able . . . to infer the user’s routines, habits and relationships with other people, organizations, places and objects, and to exploit these patterns to ease its task,” which acknowledged its potential use as a tool of mass surveillance.

In addition to the ability to profile potential enemies of the state, LifeLog had another goal that was arguably more important to the national-security state and its academic partners—the “humanization” and advancement of artificial intelligence. In late 2002, just months prior to announcing the existence of LifeLog, DARPA released a strategy document detailing development of artificial intelligence by feeding it with massive floods of data from various sources. 

The post-9/11 military-surveillance projects—LifeLog and TIA being only two of them—offered quantities of data that had previously been unthinkable to obtain and that could potentially hold the key to achieving the hypothesized “technological singularity.” The 2002 DARPA document even discusses DARPA’s effort to create a brain-machine interface that would feed human thoughts directly into machines to advance AI by keeping it constantly awash in freshly mined data. 

One of the projects outlined by DARPA, the Cognitive Computing Initiative, sought to develop sophisticated artificial intelligence through the creation of an “enduring personalized cognitive assistant,” later termed the Perceptive Assistant that Learns, or PAL. PAL, from the very beginning was tied to LifeLog, which was originally intended to result in granting an AI “assistant” human-like decision-making and comprehension abilities by spinning masses of unstructured data into narrative format. 

The would-be main researchers for the LifeLog project also reflect the program’s end goal of creating humanized AI. For instance, Howard Shrobe at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and his team at the time were set to be intimately involved in LifeLog. Shrobe had previously worked for DARPA on the “evolutionary design of complex software” before becoming associate director of the AI Lab at MIT and has devoted his lengthy career to building “cognitive-style AI.” In the years after LifeLog was cancelled, he again worked for DARPA as well as on intelligence community–related AI research projects. In addition, the AI Lab at MIT was intimately connected with the 1980s corporation and DARPA contractor called Thinking Machines, which was founded by and/or employed many of the lab’s luminaries—including Danny Hillis, Marvin Minsky, and Eric Lander—and sought to build AI supercomputers capable of human-like thought. All three of these individuals were later revealed to be close associates of and/or sponsored by the intelligence-linked pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who also generously donated to MIT as an institution and was a leading funder of and advocate for transhumanist-related scientific research.

Soon after the LifeLog program was shuttered, critics worried that, like TIA, it would continue under a different name. For example, Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told VICE at the time of LifeLog’s cancellation, “It would not surprise me to learn that the government continued to fund research that pushed this area forward without calling it LifeLog.”

Along with its critics, one of the would-be researchers working on LifeLog, MIT’s David Karger, was also certain that the DARPA project would continue in a repackaged form. He told Wired that “I am sure such research will continue to be funded under some other title . . . I can’t imagine DARPA ‘dropping out’ of a such a key research area.” 

The answer to these speculations appears to lie with the company that launched the exact same day that LifeLog was shuttered by the Pentagon: Facebook.

Thiel Information Awareness

After considerable controversy and criticism, in late 2003, TIA was shut down and defunded by Congress, just months after it was launched. It was only later revealed that that TIA was never actually shut down, with its various programs having been covertly divided up among the web of military and intelligence agencies that make up the US national-security state. Some of it was privatized.

The same month that TIA was pressured to change its name after growing backlash, Peter Thiel incorporated Palantir, which was, incidentally, developing the core panopticon software that TIA had hoped to wield. Soon after Palantir’s incorporation in 2003, Richard Perle, a notorious neoconservative from the Reagan and Bush administrations and an architect of the Iraq War, called TIA’s Poindexter and said he wanted to introduce him to Thiel and his associate Alex Karp, now Palantir’s CEO. According to a report in New York magazine, Poindexter “was precisely the person” whom Thiel and Karp wanted to meet, mainly because “their new company was similar in ambition to what Poindexter had tried to create at the Pentagon,” that is, TIA. During that meeting, Thiel and Karp sought “to pick the brain of the man now widely viewed as the godfather of modern surveillance.”

Soon after Palantir’s incorporation, though the exact timing and details of the investment remain hidden from the public, the CIA’s In-Q-Tel became the company’s first backer, aside from Thiel himself, giving it an estimated $2 million. In-Q-Tel’s stake in Palantir would not be publicly reported until mid-2006

The money was certainly useful. In addition, Alex Karp told the New York Times in October 2020, “the real value of the In-Q-Tel investment was that it gave Palantir access to the CIA analysts who were its intended clients.” A key figure in the making of In-Q-Tel investments during this period, including the investment in Palantir, was the CIA’s chief information officer, Alan Wade, who had been the intelligence community’s point man for Total Information Awareness. Wade had previously cofounded the post-9/11 Homeland Security software contractor Chiliad alongside Christine Maxwell, sister of Ghislaine Maxwell and daughter of Iran-Contra figure, intelligence operative, and media baron Robert Maxwell. 

After the In-Q-Tel investment, the CIA would be Palantir’s only client until 2008. During that period, Palantir’s two top engineers—Aki Jain and Stephen Cohen—traveled to CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia, every two weeks. Jain recalls making at least two hundred trips to CIA headquarters between 2005 and 2009. During those regular visits, CIA analysts “would test [Palantir’s software] out and offer feedback, and then Cohen and Jain would fly back to California to tweak it.” As with In-Q-Tel’s decision to invest in Palantir, the CIA’s chief information officer during this time remained one of TIA’s architects. Alan Wade played a key role in many of these meetings and subsequently in the “tweaking” of Palantir’s products.

Today, Palantir’s products are used for mass surveillance, predictive policing, and other disconcerting policies of the US national-security state. A telling example is Palantir’s sizable involvement in the new Health and Human Services–run wastewater surveillance program that is quietly spreading across the United States. As noted in a previous Unlimited Hangout report, that system is the resurrection of a TIA program called Biosurveillance. It is feeding all its data into the Palantir-managed and secretive HHS Protect data platform. The decision to turn controversial DARPA-led programs into a private ventures, however, was not limited to Thiel’s Palantir.

The Rise of Facebook

The shuttering of TIA at DARPA had an impact on several related programs, which were also dismantled in the wake of public outrage over DARPA’s post-9/11 programs. One of these programs was LifeLog. As news of the program spread through the media, many of the same vocal critics who had attacked TIA went after LifeLog with similar zeal, with Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists telling Wired at the time that “LifeLog has the potential to become something like ‘TIA cubed.’” LifeLog being viewed as something that would prove even worse than the recently cancelled TIA had a clear effect on DARPA, which had just seen both TIA and another related program cancelled after considerable backlash from the public and the press. 

The firestorm of criticism of LifeLog took its program manager, Doug Gage, by surprise, and Gage has continued to assert that the program’s critics “completely mischaracterized” the goals and ambitions of the project. Despite Gage’s protests and those of LifeLog’s would-be researchers and other supporters, the project was publicly nixed on February 4, 2004. DARPA never provided an explanation for its quiet move to shutter LifeLog, with a spokesperson stating only that it was related to “a change in priorities” for the agency. On DARPA director Tony Tether’s decision to kill LifeLog, Gage later told VICE, “I think he had been burnt so badly with TIA that he didn’t want to deal with any further controversy with LifeLog. The death of LifeLog was collateral damage tied to the death of TIA.”

Fortuitously for those supporting the goals and ambitions of LifeLog, a company that turned out to be its private-sector analogue was born on the same day that LifeLog’s cancellation was announced. On February 4, 2004, what is now the world’s largest social network, Facebook, launched its website and quickly rose to the top of the social media roost, leaving other social media companies of the era in the dust. 

A few months into Facebook’s launch, in June 2004, Facebook cofounders Mark Zuckerberg and Dustin Moskovitz brought Sean Parker onto Facebook’s executive team. Parker, previously known for cofounding Napster, later connected Facebook with its first outside investor, Peter Thiel. As discussed, Thiel, at that time, in coordination with the CIA, was actively trying to resurrect controversial DARPA programs that had been dismantled the previous year. Notably, Sean Parker, who became Facebook’s first president, also had a history with the CIA, which recruited him at the age of sixteen soon after he had been busted by the FBI for hacking corporate and military databases. Thanks to Parker, in September 2004, Thiel formally acquired $500,000 worth of Facebook shares and was added its board. Parker maintained close ties to Facebook as well as to Thiel, with Parker being hired as a managing partner of Thiel’s Founders Fund in 2006.

Thiel and Facebook cofounder Mosokvitz became involved outside of the social network long after Facebook’s rise to prominence, with Thiel’s Founder Fund becoming a significant investor in Moskovitz’s company Asana in 2012. Thiel’s longstanding symbiotic relationship with Facebook cofounders extends to his company Palantir, as the data that Facebook users make public invariably winds up in Palantir’s databases and helps drive the surveillance engine Palantir runs for a handful of US police departments, the military, and the intelligence community. In the case of the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, Palantir was also involved in utilizing Facebook data to benefit the 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign. 

Today, as recent arrests such as that of Daniel Baker have indicated, Facebook data is slated to help power the coming “war on domestic terror,” given that information shared on the platform is being used in “precrime” capture of US citizens, domestically. In light of this, it is worth dwelling on the point that Thiel’s exertions to resurrect the main aspects of TIA as his own private company coincided with his becoming the first outside investor in what was essentially the analogue of another DARPA program deeply intertwined with TIA. 

Facebook, a Front

Because of the coincidence that Facebook launched the same day that LifeLog was shut down, there has been recent speculation that Zuckerberg began and launched the project with Moskovitz, Saverin, and others through some sort of behind-the-scenes coordination with DARPA or another organ of the national-security state. While there is no direct evidence for this precise claim, the early involvement of Parker and Thiel in the project, particularly given the timing of Thiel’s other activities, reveals that the national-security state was involved in Facebook’s rise. It is debatable whether Facebook was intended from its inception to be a LifeLog analogue or if it happened to be the social media project that fit the bill after its launch. The latter seems more likely, especially considering that Thiel also invested in another early social media platform, Friendster

An important point linking Facebook and LifeLog is the subsequent identification of Facebook with LifeLog by the latter’s DARPA architect himself. In 2015, Gage told VICE that “Facebook is the real face of pseudo-LifeLog at this point.” He tellingly added, “We have ended up providing the same kind of detailed personal information to advertisers and data brokers and without arousing the kind of opposition that LifeLog provoked.” 

Users of Facebook and other large social media platforms have so far been content to allow these platforms to sell their private data so long as they publicly operate as private enterprises. Backlash only really emerged when such activities were publicly tied to the US government, and especially the US military, even though Facebook and other tech giants routinely share their users’ data with the national-security state. In practice, there is little difference between the public and private entities.

Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower, notably warned in 2019 that Facebook is just as untrustworthy as US intelligence, stating that “Facebook’s internal purpose, whether they state it publicly or not, is to compile perfect records of private lives to the maximum extent of their capability, and then exploit that for their own corporate enrichment. And damn the consequences.”

Snowden also stated in the same interview that “the more Google knows about you, the more Facebook knows about you, the more they are able . . . to create permanent records of private lives, the more influence and power they have over us.” This underscores how both Facebook and intelligence-linked Google have accomplished much of what LifeLog had aimed to do, but on a much larger scale than what DARPA had originally envisioned.

The reality is that most of the large Silicon Valley companies of today have been closely linked to the US national-security state establishment since their inception. Notable examples aside from Facebook and Palantir include Google and Oracle. Today these companies are more openly collaborating with the military-intelligence agencies that guided their development and/or provided early funding, as they are used to provide the data needed to fuel the newly announced war on domestic terror and its accompanying algorithms. 

It is hardly a coincidence that someone like Peter Thiel, who built Palantir with the CIA and helped ensure Facebook’s rise, is also heavily involved in Big Data AI-driven “predictive policing” approaches to surveillance and law enforcement, both through Palantir and through his other investments. TIA, LifeLog, and related government and private programs and institutions launched after 9/11, were always intended to be used against the American public in a war against dissent. This was noted by their critics in 2003-4 and by those who have examined the origins of the “homeland security” pivot in the US and its connection to past CIA “counterterror” programs in Vietnam and Latin America. 

Ultimately, the illusion of Facebook and related companies as being independent of the US national-security state has prevented a recognition of the reality of social media platforms and their long-intended, yet covert uses, which we are beginning to see move into the open following the events of January 6. Now, with billions of people conditioned to use Facebook and social media as part of their daily lives, the question becomes: If that illusion were to be irrevocably shattered today, would it make a difference to Facebook’s users? Or has the populace become so conditioned to surrendering their private data in exchange for dopamine-fueled social-validation loops that it no longer matters who ends up holding that data?


Part 2 of this series on Facebook will explore how the social media platform has grown into a behemoth that is much more extensive than what LifeLog’s program managers had originally envisioned. In concert with military contractors and former heads of DARPA, Facebook has spent the last several years doing two key things: (1) preparing to play a much larger role in surveillance and data mining than it currently does; and (2) advancing the development of a “humanized” AI, a major objective of LifeLog.

~via UnlimitedHangout.com

“OH, YAY!!! PRAISE DONALD TRUMP!!! OPERATION ‘WARP FACE’ IS NOW UP TO SPEED!!!”

“Congratulations, the Moderna vaccine is now available!”

~Donald Trump, 12/19/2020 – Twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QANON = CIA = THE MOSSAD ~ Anarcho Pirate: “All QAnon Breadcrumb Trails Lead To ‘CIA'”

“In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999 with the goal of developing technologies that the CIA could use to collect data. In a nutshell, the CIA Is and has been Investing in firms that mine Your Tweets, Facebook publications, Instagram photos from the onset. Why? To protect you? Think again… If private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called fake news, or make a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints. Researching In-Q-Tel further, you will see it is far reaching and has grown into a monstrous data mining organization. Adding to the misinformation surrounding this case is the double standard held by Trump supporters and alternative pseudo media. Donald Trump is a sexually compromised person controlled by Israel’s Mossad. His public image in the race for president is fake. Trump has done this, by saying all the things the opposition wanted to hear. Trump continues to carry out the agenda. What does ‘Q’, a high-level person of release have to gain by throwing bread crumbs? What does ‘In-Q-Tel’ have to gain by throwing breadcrumbs? While so much speculation has been placed on ‘Who is QAnon?’ Q has told the readers that he has the highest security clearance there is. CIA is Mossad. CIA is In-Q-Tel.”

~Anarcho Pirate

 

It appears to me that the real rabbit hole to go down is that of the data mining wonderland. In-Q-Tel is the strategic investor for the U.S. Intelligence and defense Agency that identifies and adapts technologies that (supposedly) make our nation safer. In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999 with the goal of developing technologies that the CIA could use to collect data. The US intelligence is massively expanding in Social Media surveillance pushing new technologies, including artificial intelligence for data mining. In-Q-Tel, His current focus is “anonymous entity resolution” the ability to share sensitive data without actually revealing it. That is, by using one-way hashes, you can look across various databases for a match without actually pooling all the data and making it available to all.

In-Q-Tel explore the art of possible emerging technology in areas of interest to national security. These areas include cyber security, biotechnology, commercial space, and advanced data analytics. In a nutshell, the CIA Is and has been Investing in firms that mine Your Tweets, Facebook publications, Instagram photos from the onset. Why? To protect you? Think again…

Q is Clearance Anon?

In many cases, speculation has been made about “Who is QAnon?” Q is the highest security rating. A Q authorization is a security clearance that is roughly comparable to a very secret clearance from the US Department of Defense with access to sensitive compartmentalized information (TS-SCI). This is the most permissive authorization granted by the US Government. Anyone with an active National Critical Security position Sensitivity Level 3. Most Class Q licensees will have parallel responsibilities designating them as Level 4: National Security Sensitive Personnel. These two designations being the highest risk sensitivity levels, the occupants of these positions have an invaluable responsibility to the national security of the United States.

Q clearance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_clearance

All Dots Connect and Point To QAnon as Being CIA’s In-Q-Tel

CIA is Mossad (Israeli Intelligence). Mossad is which is an arm of the CIA is in control of In-Q-Tel. To use a new form of efficient data mining lagging behind. Approach truth seekers to alternative media in their own forum. Enter as one of them to do real time data mining. But why? What does “Q” a high-level person of release have to gain by throwing bread crumbs? What does “In-Q-Tel” have to gain by throwing breadcrumbs?

Some possible reasons:

  • To see what people know?
  • Analyze how fast people can analyze clues?
  • Find out how truth researchers think things through – know their thought processes?
  • See how many people will research and how many will rely on others to find answers?
  • See how fast people lose interest if answers aren’t found fast?
  • See how many are discouraged and how long it takes to discourage certain groups?
  • See how long it takes the last one to get discouraged if nothing is forthcoming?
  • See how many remain if any, in the end?
  • See if anyone finds the real “Q” and how long it will take?
  • Lure other alternative news seekers into one hub?
  • Data mine the hub?
  • Find out who listens to them and who their followers are?
  • Size up strengths and weaknesses?
  • Infiltrate and classify researchers into groups?
  • Identify those who really know and those who don’t know?
  • Find who is capable of finding the real threats to their secrecy?
  • Allow people to bla, bla, bla and reveal the things their algorithms can’t detect?
  • Take the information and use it against them with their paid disinformation agents?
  • See who and how many will do what they are asked by “Q” without knowing who “Q” is?
  • Create disinformation wars among credible people?

Before you laugh, remember they at In-Q-Tel are already data mining everything you say on Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and all social media sites. We all at least those that will be reading this story know the NSA has breeched our privacy rights and Google, Twitter, and Facebook are data mined to monitor everything we post, tweet, and use algorithms to spy on our on line communications to find out our friends, likes, dislikes, etc. from our computers, TV’s, smart phones and other devices.

What many do not know is Q’s long arm high level security clearance behind all this. Flexible robots capable of grasping delicate objects, computer algorithms designed to identify an “internal threat”, and artificial intelligence to sift through large sets of data are just some of the technologies pursued by In-Q-Tel. The ICA invests in companies that leverage your Instagram tweets and photos. Many undisclosed companies receive funding from In-Q-Tel. The focus is on research and exploitation of social networks. These companies, which provide unique tools for extracting data from platforms such as Twitter as well as other In-Q-Tel portfolio companies. Researching In-Q-Tel further, you will see it is far reaching and has grown into a monstrous data mining organization. If private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called fake news, or make a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints….

Follow the White Rabbit

For those reading the postings of Anon Q on 4chan’s Pol thread one of other reference of Anon Q related is “Follow the White Rabbit”. And well, there is a Wikipedia page “The White Rabbit Project”. White Rabbit is the name of a collaborative project including CERN, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, and other partners from universities and industry to develop a fully deterministic Ethernet-based network for general purpose data transfer and sub-nanosecond accuracy time transfer. Its initial use was as a timing distribution network for control and data acquisition timing of the accelerator sites at CERN as well as in GSI’s Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) project. The hardware designs as well as the source code are publicly available. The name of the project is a reference to the White Rabbit appearing in Lewis Carroll’s novel Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.

No joke, read:

Follow the White Rabbit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_White_Rabbit_Project

“The White Rabbit Project” (PDF):

Click to access tuc004.pdf

The Mossad, Israel’s primary intelligence agency, is preparing to launch a technology investment fund that will support Israeli-based hi-tech startups, with an eye to utilizing cutting-edge technologies in its spy operations. The fund will invest in Israeli-owned technology startups, using money from the Mossad’s budget, without any outside capital. But instead of getting its share of the financial profit, the Mossad will ask instead to own the rights to the startup companies’ end-products and to be able to use them in intelligence-related work, In-Q-Tel, a not-for-profit venture capital firm that operates as the technology investment firm of the United States Central Intelligence Agency. Based in Arlington, Virginia, In-Q-Tel invests in hi-tech technology startups focusing on new technologies that may be of use to the US Intelligence Community.

Read how Israeli spy agency creates fund to invest in tech firms:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/israeli-spy-agency-creates-fund-invest-tech-firms-160645882.html

While so much speculation has been placed on “Who is QAnon?” Q has told the readers that he has the highest security clearance there is. Everyone runs to the President or someone in his top advisory capacity as the highest clearance so they think one of these must be “Q”. CIA is Mossad. CIA is In-Q-Tel. Adding to the misinformation Surrounding this case is the double standard held by Trump supporters and alternative pseudo media. All everything against Trump is forbidden. It was largely television propaganda that led to Donald Trump’s public misperception as a ‘foreigner against the pavement’ for the public to be groomed for Trump to be their hero. Donald Trump is a sexually compromised person controlled by Israel’s Mossad. His public image in the race for president is fake. Trump has done this, by saying all the things the opposition wanted to hear. Trump continues to carry out the agenda…

Read Trump Controlled by Mossad:

https://archive.is/Q4gr2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s good I stop this article here. So Q is not legit. Psyop, or is it something more sinister? Or is it just someone trying to get people away from the news they find alone? Time will tell us…

 

~via Steemit

 

From Lisa Renee:

 

“Over the past few years we have been subjected to increasing censorship via algorithmic control that is based upon the collection of our personal data. Obviously, it is disturbing to know that the Controllers and the NAA want as much data and genetic profiling collected from all of us, as a type of energetic harvesting machine. As more intimate details are gathered about our connections and preferences, that information is harvested and can actually be used to censor or suppress certain levels of information from being available to us. The controller comprehends that psychological manipulation used to incite people’s subconscious desires is not only how they can shape false narratives, but also get the masses to continually buy products and associate positive belief systems with those products. Maybe it is a pundit personality looking to gather a large online following through disseminating the cabal wars through the QAnon movement. Maybe it’s a guru personality offering DNA activation and the ability to manifest anything you want. Power and influence are forces gathered through which they become a Pied Piper, a person that is celebrated, worshipped or made into a hero. Republican-Democrat, Trump-Hillary, they are all interchangeable images projecting the lie of the Hero-Enemy that the public has wanted to hear in a lullaby to stay asleep. It is all a game of deception and manipulation to gain control over planetary resources of energy. A system built on Archontic Deception Strategy and manipulation, in order to herd the cattle of the sleeping masses straight into the slaughterhouse. To stop being herded by the psychological and emotional manipulation of Mind Control we must be awakened, even if what we see is painful. Illusions and deceptions are shattering everywhere.”

~via Propaganda Model, Reeducation of Human Values

 

‘IF YOU THINK TRUMP IS SAVING AMERICA… DON’T FORGET TO DRINK YOUR KOOL-AID.’ ~ Benjamin Fulford on “U.S. Descent Into Chaos”

“The Khazarian Mafia is pulling out all the stops to destroy the Constitutional Republic of the United States as violence and arson cause further descent into chaos, NSA, MI6, and Pentagon sources agree. In the past 50 years we have wiped out numerous wildlife, and yet Trump and his backers have failed to offer even a basic solution or approach to this problem. Trump the builder commented right after 9/11 that bombs must have been used to bring down the towers so he knows the score, but failed to mention Israel’s involvement in 9/11 or, as a matter of fact, any truth about 9/11 whatsoever so we must ask ourselves… Why? We are now in the looting and burning home stretch so don’t expect mass arrests of Democratic politicians like Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and company. One source even believes Biden is being set up to be such a loser that one cannot help but suspect that the same people who support Trump have deliberately placed an unelectable Biden as his opponent. The more likely scenario is lawsuits and chaos concerning mail-in ballots that could last for weeks or months. Either scenario will leave Trump ‘in power.’ We realize many people, including many of our subscribers, think U.S. President Donald Trump is going to save the day and ‘Make America Great Again.’ However, some sources say the depopulation Satanists have other contingency plans. If you think Trump is ‘saving America,’ why has he been repeatedly calling for all Americans to be vaccinated by November? Even the U.S. CDC is now being forced to admit the pandemic is over. It appears Americans are being presented with a false choice of senile criminal Biden and his merry band of rioting Antifa anarchists and BLM communists, or Israeli loving Trump who has failed to contain the deadly virus pandemic and his gun owner constitutional patriots. Nevertheless, how can we reconcile Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, as a member of the ‘kill 90% of humanity enslave the rest,’ Chabad death cult. Remember, Kushner owns the 666 Fifth Avenue building where injectable microchips were developed. Either way, by the end of the year the Kool-Aid drinkers will be lining up for a vaccine, combined with a digital wallet and ‘prosperity.’ The scenario unfolding is an election that is an obvious farce even to the most deeply brainwashed of the Kool-Aid drinking sheeple.”

~Benjamin Fulford

 

 

~via Benjamin Fulford

SAY ‘AYE!’ TO THIS FREE IQ TEST… AND ‘NAY!’ Q… VERY MUCH ~ Tye A Hampton: “Look Beyond The Q Psyop — At Reality”

“I could go on, at length pointing out why Q is crap, and Trump is cabal, but, this is just a short, ‘reality check’, folks. The light of truth, will set you free, open your mind and look beyond the Q psyop, at reality… Don’t believe fantasy, I’m telling you this is not reality, and you’re needed in the true resistance ‘against both Republican and Democrat’ swamp rats in the US Congress, Supreme Court, and yes, against Mr. Trump whom has flooded the White House and the rest of government with, ‘businesspeople’ ie: cabal operatives, running this country. The cabal is obviously still firmly in control of the world, running every nation, most all, of the media, and most large trans national (if not most all US) corporations on earth. Otherwise these changes would be obvious. It’s time for ‘real’ change, and any belief in the two party cabal controlled system, will not bring that, about. If, you vote, Vote against both parties.”

~Tye A Hampton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~via Prepare For Change