‘BLđŸš«CKED ON YOUTUBE!’ ~ Truth Over Comfort: “James Corbett on Obama, Trump, Q, Musk and Hopium”

via Truth Over Comfort: In today’s video, I conducted an interview with James Corbett, about the concept of Hopium, and his documentary featuring it. We discuss Obama, Trump, QAnon and more. Hopium is intertwined with society in politics, religion, idols and general life. As with Obama and Trump, this belief of someone coming to save society, like a superhero or divine figure, followed a pattern of disappointment and egregious lies.

Follow link to view video:


~via The Corbett Report


HENRY MAKOW: “Is It Possible That Almost Everyone Of ‘Importance’ In The Past Was A Crypto Jew And Satanist?

“Is it possible that almost everyone of ‘importance’ in the past was a Crypto Jew and Satanist? The Corona hoax may be the tip of a spear that stretches back centuries. The spear is aimed at the heart of mankind. Are all these prominent people spanning five centuries of Crypto-Jews? If true, it casts history in a new light. EVERYBODY was involved. The Illuminati — FDR, Hitler, Stalin & Churchill — are essentially Crypto-Jews. So are Hillary and Trump. History could be re-written based on an analysis of the role played by these personages. Below is a list of political and cultural leaders over more than 500 years whose official portraits show them making a Triad Hand Sign, joining their third and fourth fingers. The Triad Claw hand sign — holding middle finger together — signals membership in Kabbalist conspiracy. Apparently, this is a Marrano gesture which signals the letters M & W, symbolizing 666 from the three V’s.  The letter V is ‘waw’ in Hebrew and ‘vav’ in Gematria and is the 6th letter in both. What are the chances that people living centuries apart would make the same Masonic hand sign? The Triad Sign is how Satanists recognize each other and signal fealty to Lucifer.”

~Henry Makow

“All religions have issued from the Kabbalah and return to it; everything scientific and grand in the religious dreams of the Illuminati… all the Masonic associations owe to it… the Kabbalah, their Secrets and their symbols.”

~Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma


“Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.”

~Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise


“Freemasonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left?”

~The Jewish Tribune, editorial, 1927


“In politics nothing is accidental. If something happens, be assured it was planned this way.”

~Franklin Delano Roosevelt


“The one who cannot see that on Earth a big endeavor is taking place, an important plan, on which realization we are allowed to collaborate as faithful servants, certainly has to be blind”

~Winston Churchill


“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.”

~Revelation 2:9


“What humanity is enduring is a global plandemic and attempts to force vaccination mandates are not the result of a freak accident, random natural events or stemming from absurd levels of human incompetence. This surreal drama of evil takeover has been meticulously planned and orchestrated for hundreds if not thousands of years by bloodline families that worship anti-life or satanic based ideologies. The Church of Satan uses the Hebrew letters at each of the points of the Sigil of Baphomet to represent Leviathan in their Black Magic rituals. This means Satanists that conjure or evoke Baphomet fields to power up Leviathan entities for service-to-self rituals, are actually contributing to the feeding of the Beast Machine and its AI technology for maintaining the electromagnetic harness. The Power Elite believe they are the chosen ones to fulfill this end of times prophecy and direct the AI programs in order to wake up and agitate these Monsters of Chaos, which they have co-created from the shadow fragments and reversal elementals on the surface. This is another example of why Satanism is a natural segue into the Transhumanism agendas, as many materialists are very pro-artificial intelligence.”

~Lisa Renee


See complete list of Crypto Jews

Masonic hand gesture | Triad Claw | Marrano Crypto-Jew sign of historical figures:

Alfonso V of Aragon 1396-1458

Renaissance King of Aragon, Valencia, Majorca, Sardinia, Corsica & Sicily

Giovanni Pico della Mirandola 1463-1494

Renaissance philosopher, studied the Hebrew Kabbalah. Related to Este, Sforza & Gonzaga

Edward Montagu 1485-1557

Ancestor of the Dukes of Montagu & Manchester and the Earls of Sandwich

Ignatius of Loyola 1491-1556

Marrano Jew, founded the Society of Jesus. Religious leader during Counter-Reformation

Charles V 1500-1558

Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor & King of Spain, oversaw Americas colonization

William Grey 1509-1562

Baron Grey de Wilton, military commander serving in France under the Earl of Bedford

Giulia Gonzaga 1513-1566

Italian oligarch of the Renaissance, wife of Vespasiano Colonna Duke of Traetto

Catherine de’ Medici 1519-1589

Queen consort of France as wife of King Henry II of France

Eleanor of Toledo 1522-1562

Daughter of Duke of Alba, wife of Cosimo de’ Medici, mother of Dukes of Tuscany

Richard Bingham 1528-1599

English soldier & naval commander during the Tudor conquest of Ireland

Elizabeth I 1533-1603

Queen of England, established Church of England’s independence from Rome

Joanna of Austria 1547-1578

Wife of Francesco I de’ Medici, mother of Marie de’ Medici

Henry of Navarre 1553-1610

First monarch of the House of Bourbon in France. 1st Huguenot King

James I 1566-1625

King of England, united the English, Scottish and Irish crowns

Karl I of Liechtenstein 1569-1627

1st Prince of Liechtenstein, founder of the Princely Family of Liechtenstein

Josephus Coymans 1591-1677

Merchant from the rich International banking Coymans family of Antwerp

Elisabeth of France 1602-1644

Daughter of Henry of Navarre and Marie de’ Medici. 1st wife of King Philip IV of Spain

William Russell 1616-1700

1st Duke of Bedford, carried the sceptre at the coronation of William III of Orange

John Evelyn 1620-1706

English writer and diarist, co-founder of the Royal Society

Archibald Campbell 1629-1685

Earl of Argyll, took part in the Monmouth rebellion, fellow of the Royal Society

Christopher Wren 1632-1723

Founder & president of the Royal Society, Freemason

Ralph Montagu 1638-1709

1st Duke of Montagu, of the famous Montagu family

Isaac Newton 1642-1727

English intellectual, Royal Society, one of the most influential people in history

Jonathan Trelawny 1650-1711

A British Bishop of Bristol, Exeter and Winchester. Supported William III

James Bertie 1653-1699

1st Earl of Abingdon, son of Montagu Bertie the 2nd Earl of Lindsey

Charles Montagu 1661-1715

Devised the establishment of the Bank of England. 1st First Lord of the Treasury

Sophia Dorothea of Hanover 1666-1726

Wife and cousin of George I of Great Britain, and mother of George II

Frederick Augustus I 1670-1733

Elector of Saxony, King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania

Spencer Compton 1673-1743

1st Earl of Wilmington, Prime Minister of Great Britain and 1st Lord of the Treasury

John Manners 1676-1721

2nd Duke of Rutland, son of John Manners of the ‘Glorious Revolution’

James Craggs 1686-1721

Acquaintance of King George I while in Hanover, accompanied him to England

John Wesley 1703-1791

Church of England cleric, founder of the Methodist movement

Thomas Gray 1716-1771

English poet, classical scholar and professor at Cambridge University

John Adams 1735-1826

2nd President of the United States and negotiator of the peace treaty with U.K

Francis Asbury 1745-1816

1st bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States

Wolfgang von Goethe 1749-1832

German writer, served the duchy of Saxe-Weimar, member of the Illuminati

John Marshall 1755-1835

Chief Justice of the United States, developed the American legal system

Joseph Fesch 1763-1839

French cardinal, closely associated with the family of Napoleon Bonaparte

Christian VIII of Denmark 1786-1848

King of Denmark and Norway of the House of Oldenburg

Miguel of Portugal 1802-1866

King of Portugal of the House of Braganza and Knight of the Order of Christ

Napoleon III 1808-1873

1st President of the French Republic and Emperor of the French

Alexander III of Russia 1845-1894

Emperor of Russia of the House of Oldenburg from 1881 until his death in 1894

Marsilio Ficino 1433-1499

Philosopher, priest and homosexual of the early Italian Renaissance, worked for de’ Medici’s

Giles of Viterbo 1469-1532

Cardinal of Catholic Church. Studied the Kabbalah and Jewish mysticism

Catherine of Aragon 1485-1536

1st wife of King Henry VIII of England, sparked England’s break from Rome

Clarice de’ Medici 1493-1528

Granddaughter of Lorenzo de’ Medici. Educated Catherine, the future Queen of France

Ferdinand I 1503-1564

Holy Roman Emperor, Habsburg, supported the Society of Jesus

Francis Borgia 1510-1572

4th Duke of Gandia, third Superior General of the Society of Jesus

Philip Neri 1515-1595

Italian priest, worked for the de’ Medici family and supported Henry of Navarre

Cosimo I de’ Medici 1519-1574

Duke of Florence, Grand Duke of Tuscany. Restored power in Florence

James Douglas 1525-1581

4th Earl of Morton and regent of Scotland, supported the Reformation

Maria of Spain 1528-1603

Daughter of Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand I & wife of Maximilian II

Edward VI 1537-1553

King of England, educated by his fathers sixth wife Catherine Parr like his sister

Miguel de Cervantes 1547-1616

Spanish novelist, poet, and playwright. Jewish Marrano and educated by the Jesuits

Cesar de Nostredame 1553-1629

Son of French astrologer and occultist Michel de Nostredame (Nostradamus)

Francis de Sales 1567-1622

Saint in the Roman Catholic Church. Protestant sympathiser, educated by Jesuits

Robert Fludd 1574-1637

English occultist, astrologer, mathematician and Hermetic writer

Isaac Commelin 1598-1676

Dutch historian for the Orange family and the Dutch East India company

Carel Reyniersz 1604-1653

Dutch Admiral and merchant. Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies

Johan van Riebeeck 1619-1677

Dutch East India Company colonial administrator & founder of Cape Town

Johan de Witt 1625-1672

Grand Pensionary of Holland, tutored a young William III of Orange

Christiaan Huygens 1629-1695

Dutch mathematician. Founder of modern Calculus, Royal Society

Gaspar Fagel 1634-1688

Grand Pensionary of Holland, tutored and supported William III of Orange

William Cavendish 1640-1707

1st Duke of Devonshire, strong supporter of the Glorious Revolution & William III

Henry Darnall 1645-1711

Proprietary Agent of Baron Baltimore. Granddad of Charles Carroll of Carrollton

William III 1650-1702

King of England, Prince of Orange. Came to power after the “Glorious Revolution”

George Churchill 1654-1710

Younger brother of the Duke of Marlborough. Supported William III

Joseph Sabine 1661-1739

General in 9 Years’ War, War of Spanish Succession & Jacobite Rebellion

George Delaval 1667-1723

English naval admiral and diplomat. Fought in the War of the Spanish Succession

Joseph Addison 1672-1719

English playwright and poet, worked for John Somers and Charles Montagu

Charles Townshend 1674-1738

2nd Viscount Townshend, Secretary of State, Fellow of the Royal Society

John Campbell 1678-1743

2nd Duke of Argyll, Scottish soldier, helped secure Hanoverian succession

Thomas Pelham-Holles 1693-1768

1st Duke of Newcastle, Prime Minister of Great Britain & Secretary of State

Frederick, Prince of Wales 1707-1751

Duke of Edinburgh, eldest son of George II and father of George III

Christopher Smart 1722-1771

English poet, notorious member of the Freemasons and Masonic author

Josias of Saxe-Coburg 1737-1815

Austrian general and Lieutenant Field Marshal in the Seven Years’ War

Tadeusz Koƛciuszko 1746-1818

Polish-Lithuanian aristocrat and general in the American Revolutionary War

Ferdinand I of Two Sicilies 1751-1825

King of Naples & Sicily, of the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies

Alexander Hamilton 1755-1804

1st U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, founded U.S. Mint & 1st National Bank

Ferdinand III 1769-1824

Grand Duke of Tuscany of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine

Robert Peel 1788-1850

Prime Minister of the U.K, created the modern concept of the police force

Sophie of Bavaria 1805-1872

Mother of Franz Joseph Emperor of Austria & Maximilian Emperor of Mexico

Otto of Greece 1815-1867

First modern King of Greece under the protection of the U.K, France and Russia

Theodore Roosevelt 1858-1919

President of the United States, Freemason, imperialist

Lorenzo de’ Medici 1449-1492

One of the wealthiest men in Europe, patron of Marsilio Ficino & Giovanni Pico della Mirandola

Alfonso I d’Este 1476-1534

Duke of Ferrara, of the House of Este during the Italian Wars

Archibald Douglas 1489-1557

Scottish Earl of Angus, ally of Henry VIII, consolidated the Douglas families power

Francis I 1494-1547

France’s first renaissance monarch. Gave rise to the Protestant Reformation

Isabella of Portugal 1503-1539

Holy Roman Empress, wife of Charles V, daughter of Manuel I of Portugal

James V of Scotland 1512-1542

King of Scotland, raised by Archibald Douglas Earl of Angus, ally of Francis I

Nicholas Throckmorton 1515-1571

Royal diplomat, worked for Elizabeth I, supported Reformation

William Cecil 1521-1598

Baron Burghley, chief advisor of Queen Elizabeth I, founder of the Cecil dynasty

Philip II 1527-1598

King of Spain, Portugal, Naples and Sicily of the House of Habsburg

Robert Dudley 1532-1588

Earl of Leicester of the famous Dudley family. English diplomat

Francis Drake 1540-1596

English sea captain and slave trader. Provoked the Spanish Armada

Ferdinando I de’ Medici 1549-1609

Grand Duke of Tuscany, gained great wealth through Medici banks

Walter Raleigh 1554-1618

English Protestant aristocrat, explorer and populariser of tobacco in England

Maurice of Nassau 1567-1625

Stadtholder, Prince of Orange, foremost general of the 80 years war

Philip III 1578-1621

Habsburg King of Spain & Portugal. Married his cousin

Anne of Austria 1601-1666

Queen of France, mother of Louis XIV of France & Philippe I Duke of Orleans

John Milton 1608-1674

English poet, propagandist and official serving under Oliver Cromwell

Henry Oldenburg 1619-1677

Foremost spy in 17th century Europe, 1st Secretary of the Royal Society

Robert Boyle 1627-1691

Founder of modern Chemistry, Royal Society, son of 1st Earl of Cork

Arthur Capell 1631-1683

Earl of Essex, Protestant supporter of William III of Orange

William Douglas-Hamilton 1634-1694

Duke of Hamilton, granted the Scottish crown to William III of Orange

Philippe I of Orleans 1640-1701

Founder of House of Orleans, ancestor of most modern-day Catholic royalty

John Cecil 1648-1700

Earl of Exeter, known as Lord Burghley, supported William III of Orange

William Randolph 1650-1721

Colonist, ancestor of Thomas Jefferson and Cheif Justice John Marshall

James Blair 1656-1743

Church of England missionary & founder of the College of William & Mary

Simon Harcourt 1661-1727

1st Viscount Harcourt, Lord Chancellor of Great Britain. Arranged the union with Scotland

Samuel Vetch 1668-1732

Protestant colonial governor of Nova Scotia, involved in Monmouth Rebellion

Charles Lennox 1672-1723

1st Duke of Richmond, illegitimate son of King Charles II and a Freemason

Richard Temple 1675-1749

1st Viscount Cobham, British soldier, political mentor to the young William Pitt

George II 1683-1760

King of Great Britain and Ireland, gave rise to British government power

Henry Pelham 1694-1754

Prime Minister of Great Britain & Chancellor of the Exchequer

Robert Livingston 1708-1790

3rd Lord of Livingston Manor, grandson of Robert Livingston the Elder

Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc 1725-1797

70th Prince and Grand Master of the Order of Malta from 1775 to 1797

George III 1738-1820

King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

Leopold II 1747-1792

Holy Roman Emperor, King of Hungary & Bohemia & Grand Duke of Tuscany

Maria Luisa of Parma 1751-1819

Queen consort of Spain & daughter of King Louis XV of the House of Bourbon

José Álvarez de Toledo 1756-1796

Duke of Medina Sidonia & Alba de Tormes, husband of the Duchess of Alba

Augustus of Saxe-Gotha 1772-1822

Duke of Saxe-Gotha, grandfather of Albert, Prince Consort of Queen Victoria

Pope Pius IX 1792-1878

Longest reigning Pope in history, centralized the Church in the Vatican

Joseph Smith 1805-1844

American religious leader and the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement

Pedro II of Brazil 1825-1891

Emperor of Brazil, reigned for over 58 years, Grand Master of Order of Christ

Wilhelm II 1859-1941

Emperor of Germany and King of Prussia, grandson of Queen Victoria

Christopher Columbus 1451-1506

Marrano Jewish explorer, aided by Marranos Louis de Santangel and Antonio de Marchena

Martin Luther 1483-1546

Initiated the Protestant Reformation, funded by Frederick III of Saxony of the House of Wettin

Vittoria Colonna 1490-1547

Italian Protestant, daughter of Fabrizio Colonna of the powerful Colonna family

Eleanor of Austria 1498-1558

Habsburg Infanta of Castile, wife of Manuel I of Portugal & Francis I of France

Gemma Frisius 1508-1555

Dutch cartographer and philosopher, taught occultist John Dee at the University of Leuven

Catherine Parr 1512-1548

Protestant, Henry VIII’s sixth wife. Restored Elizabeth to line of succession

James Hamilton 1516-1575

Earl of Arran, great grandson of James II of Scotland. Supported Reformation

Christina of Denmark 1521-1590

Queen of Denmark, Norway & Sweden, wife of Francesco II Sforza, Duke of Milan

Maximilian II 1527-1576

Holy Roman Emperor, member of the House of Habsburg

John Hawkins 1532-1595

Shipbuilder, naval commander and slave trader. 2nd cousin of Francis Drake

Francesco I de’ Medici 1541-1587

Grand Duke of Tuscany, continued the heavy taxation of his subjects

Francesco della Rovere 1549-1631

Duke of Urbino, related to Este, de’ Medici and Farnese dynasties

Philip Sidney 1554-1586

English Poet and soldier, nephew of Robert Dudley

Gerard Reynst 1568-1615

A founder of the Dutch East India Company, Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies

Hendrik Brouwer 1581-1643

Dutch East India Company colonial administrator in Japan & Dutch East Indies

John Berkeley 1602-1678

Wealthy English royalist soldier, brother of William Berkeley governor of Virginia

Richard Boyle 1612-1698

2nd Earl of Cork, Lord High Treasurer of Ireland like his millionaire father

Rupert of the Rhine 1619-1682

Duke of Bavaria & Cumberland. 1st Governor of the Hudson’s Bay Company

Henry Howard 1628-1684

Duke of Norfolk and Earl Marshal, gave his library to the Royal Society

Cyril Wyche 1632-1707

Lawyer & politician, original member of the Royal Society

Charles Calvert 1637-1715

3rd Baron Baltimore & Proprietary Governor of Maryland

Henry de Nassau 1640-1708

Lord Overkirk, son of Maurice of Nassau and 2nd cousin of King William III of England

James Scott 1649-1685

Duke of Monmouth, illegitimate son of Charles II, led the Monmouth Rebellion

John Somers 1651-1716

Chief architect of English union with Scotland and the Protestant succession

Thomas Bruce 1656-1741

2nd Earl of Ailesbury & 3rd Earl of Elgin, a Lord of the Royal Bedchamber

William Cowper 1665-1723

1st Earl Cowper, 1st Lord Chancellor of Great Britain, supported William III

Charles Beauclerk 1670-1726

1st Duke of St Albans, illegitimate son of King Charles II

William Cavendish 1672-1729

2nd Duke of Devonshire, served as Lord President of the Council

Frederick I of Sweden 1676-1751

King of Sweden & Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, founder of the order of Seraphim

Charles VI 1685-1740

Holy Roman Emperor of the House of Habsburg. Father of Maria Theresa

William Cavendish 1698-1755

3rd Duke of Devonshire, most recent common ancestor of Charles & Diana

George Whitefield 1714-1770

English Anglican priest, active in the British North American colonies

Prince Hall 1735-1807

Founder of “Black Freemasonry” or Prince Hall Freemasonry in the USA.

Joseph II 1741-1790

Holy Roman Emperor, first ruler of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine in Austria

Thomas Coke 1747-1814

Father of Methodist Missions, continued John Wesley’s work in America

Bertrand BarĂšre de Vieuzac 1755-1841

French politician, member of the National Convention during the French Revolution

Horatio Nelson 1758-1805

1st Viscount Nelson & 1st Duke of Bronte, British flag officer in Napoleonic Wars

Henry Vassall-Fox 1773-1840

3rd Baron Holland & Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster

Adolphe Thiers 1797-1877

French politician, Prime Minister & President of the French Republic

Giuseppe Garibaldi 1807-1882

Italian revolutionary & Freemason, Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy

Edward VII 1841-1910

King of the United Kingdom, of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

Adolf Hitler 1889-1945

Leader of the National Socialist German Workers Party, head of state of Germany

The Westside hand gesture or Triad Claw/Marrano gesture signals the letters M & W, which symbolise 666 from the three V’s. The letter V is “waw” in Hebrew and “vav” in Gematria and is the 6th letter in both.

San Ignacio de Loyola, who founded the Jesuits by approval of Pope Paul III in 1539, came from a “Marrano” family…from every indication. In fact, strong and credible confirmation comes from none other than Benjamin Disraeli, an ethnic Jew and the Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1868 and 1874-1876, who wrote in his book “Coningsby” (London, 1844) that “the first Jesuits were Jews”. It is interesting that Loyola was compelled to repeatedly deny “Jewish” ethnicity.

The term “Marrano” is a Spanish expression which means “secret Jew”, i.e. a falsely converted Jew. Therefore, on the one hand, Ignatius Loyola displayed an outward show of Catholic devotion but in dramatically contradictory fashion…appears to have been a member of “Alumbrado” which was a forerunner to the Illuminati organization (the word “Alumbrado” is simply a Spanish translation for the term “Illuminati”) and another suspected Kabbalah concoction. Alumbrado devotees manifested a strangely conflicting mixture–many expressions of “godly” sentiments in their outward displays…but bizarre goings-on in their private meetings which fit the descriptions occult practices, and even of satanic ‘possession’ or interaction. – Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing


~via HenryMakow.com


VIDEO DOUBLE-FEATURE: “100% Proof Donald Trump Is a Freemason of the Synagogue of Satan” / “Is This Hard Core Proof That Donald Trump Is a Traitor to America?”

Video 1:

You have to be mentally challenged to not see and hear and know that DONALD TRUMP IS A FREEMASON/LUCIFERIAN. He’s about as “Christian” as Stalin was.

WATCH VIDEO 1 HERE!



Video 2:

Is Trump a man of God and TRUTH or son of Satan and LIES?

WATCH VIDEO 2 HERE!



Comments from both threads:

“Deception! Deception! So many people follow him and they think he truly cares about us. We are all blind and being played.”


“Not.”


“It’s true. Can you see now? Or are you waiting to get his warp speed vaccine?”


“Awesome job bringing this to the light.”


“MAGA is the highest order in the church of Satan. Makes you think. Go to churchofsatan.com and type in MAGA in the address bar.”


“Lol
..I kind of surmised as much before the bastard even got elected. He was merely the opposite side of the same corrupt coin.”


~via Justin Wilmot / N. Morgan


‘THERE IS NO POLITICAL SOLUTION’. . . ReallyGraceful: Episode One ~ “The Game’s Afoot”


WATCH VIDEO HERE!


~via ReallyGraceful


JAMES CORBETT: “How to Play 3D Chess”

It’s a ridiculous, no good, stupid, rotten meme.

You know, the idea that every horrible move that Precedent Trump ever made (like appointing John Bolton or launching Operation Warp Speed) was actually some super complicated three-dimensional chess move intended to accomplish the exact opposite of what he was actually doing? (“You don’t understand, man! He’s appointing Gina “CIA Torture” Haspel because he wants to expose her role in CIA torture!”)

Yeah, that meme.

Well, as much as “Trump the 3D chess master” represented the apotheosis of Hopium for the Trump Train crowd (cf. The Babylon Bee’s spot-on satirical headline from January 20, 2021: “Republican Starting To Think Trump Might Not Pull Off A Last-Minute 4D Chess Move“), the idea of three-dimensional chess itself is not without merit. After all, I employed it in 2013 to discuss the reality ofChina and the New World Orderand used it again in 2014 to discuss the true nature of the Global Chessboard. (Don’t blame me for launching the meme, though! The earliest reference I could find was a 2010 clip of Cenk Uyghur discussing liberal defenses of Barack Obama.)

So in defense of this much-abused idea, allow me to present to you a beginner’s guide outlining How To Play 3D Chess.

2D Chess vs. 3D Chess

We all know how to play regular old, run-of-the-mill 2D chess, right? Well, if not, here’s your crash course.

Long story short: Each player controls a set of sixteen pieces, one white and one black. Each piece can move in certain, proscribed ways around the chessboard—64 squares laid out in an 8×8 grid—and can capture the other side’s pieces by moving to a square that is occupied by an opponent. The goal is to “checkmate” the king of the opposite side by forcing him into a situation where he is unable to move without being captured.

Sadly for any chess aficionados in the crowd, though, we are not here today to talk about the game of chess. We are here to talk about chess as it is often employed by the globalist jet set: as a metaphor for geopolitical struggle. After all, just as in chess, the Machiavellian strategists of the global order like to imagine themselves moving pawns around the global chessboard in order to gain control of this or that square and, eventually, to checkmate their opponents.

That chess is just a metaphor for geopolitics and that chess strategy bears more than a passing resemblance to geopolitical strategy is, after all, the central conceit of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 work, The Grand Chessboard. In that book, Brzezinski writes at length about the “oddly shaped Eurasian chessboard” and the moves that the American empire should be making on that board to insure their continuing global hegemony. Thus, Russia, for instance “remains a player” in the game for Eurasia “even though it has lost some of its ‘pieces,’ as well as some key spaces on the Eurasian chessboard.”

The chess analogy becomes even more apparent in times of war. Think of the military planners huddled around a battlefield map like a chess master huddled around the board, observing the pieces in play and deciding where to deploy their forces next. Even in the current war against the “invisible enemy” of coronavirus, one gets the sense that Bill Gates believes himself to be a chess master, moving the pawns around his global chessboard to “prevent the next pandemic” as shown in one of his recent creepy videos.

But this is 2D chess.  Now let’s consider 3D chess.

Although many will think of three-dimensional chess as a fictional game concocted by the Star Trek writers, 3D variants of the classic chessboard have existed since Lionel Kieseritzky developed his 8x8x8 cubic chess board in 1851. Different 3D chess variants have been developed in the intervening century and a half, but they generally involve the introduction of playing surfaces “above” the regular, two-dimensional chessboard, and extend the rules of movement for each piece into the third dimension so they can “jump” up and “fall” down to the other boards.

So if 2D chess has obvious utility as a metaphor for geopolitics, how about 3D chess? Can we learn something about how the geopolitical world really functions by looking at it from a 3D perspective?

2D Politics vs. 3D Politics

Geopolitics is like chess. The world (mis)leaders are the players, moving their pieces (people, resources, military forces) around the board (the world) in order to checkmate their opponent (their geopolitical foe).

So far, so straightforward. But here’s where things get tricky.

What if a player thought they were playing two-dimensional chess when in fact they were playing three-dimensional chess? If for some reason they could only see the 2D chessboard, you can imagine how shocked they would be to see pieces dropping onto the board seemingly out of nowhere and taking control of squares. Where did that piece come from? Who’s controlling it? Why did it appear there? What is its mission? . . . And is it just me, or is that a white piece that’s been painted black?

To say that this would be confusing for the 2D player is an understatement. It would, in fact, mean that some moves and events that happen in the game would be completely incomprehensible to those solely focused on the 2D match.

Now what if this were the correct way to envision geopolitics? Not as a regular 2D match between nation-state opponents, but as a 3D game where nation-states compete on the regular board while shadowy forces command extra pieces that appear from some unseen board and work toward goals that are not immediately apparent?

Does that sound far-fetched? Well, until just a few years ago the term “deep state” was itself considered to be an outlandish conspiracy theory, something so ridiculous that it was not to be countenanced at all in polite, mainstream conversation (the occasional Bill Moyers documentary notwithstanding). But since the mainstreaming of the shadow government began in earnest several years ago, the term “deep state” has entered into the popular lexicon. Even the term “deep state” belies an understanding of the extra-dimensionality of this political entity. It is not operating on the regular plane of politics, but somewhere “deeper,” below the surface of what we can see.

With the 3D chess metaphor at our disposal, then, we are better situated to understand some of the moves that the deep state is making on the “grand chessboard.”

Take the Cold War. From the 2D perspective, the narrative is straightforward enough: the USA controlled the white pieces, the Soviets controlled the black pieces, and these two well-matched opponents fought over the grand chessboard for decades—mostly in Afghanistan, Vietnam and other “peripheral” areas of the board—before the game became too expensive and the Soviet team resigned.

But this perspective comes up short in describing the actual events of the 20th century. Why did the west prop up the Soviets with technology transfers, not just in the early stages of the Bolshevik Revolution but right through into the heart of the Cold War? Why did the American government build up the Soviet threat, including aiding them in the development of nuclear weapons, through the lend-lease program? Why did American corporations provide the means for the creation of the Soviet war machine? Weren’t they mortal enemies?

But what seems baffling from a two-dimensional perspective—where “Team USA” is facing off against “Team Soviet” for control of the grand chessboard—becomes almost embarrassingly simple if we simply take account of the third dimension of the game. In the case of the Cold War, that third dimension was occupied by a clique of wealthy oligarchs who wielded their wealth and power to drop chess pieces on the board at will in order to prolong a conflict here, or to end a conflict there. These 3D players could manipulate the 2D game at their will, brandishing the epithet of “conspiracy theorist” to deride anyone who dared to look beyond the second dimension to explain the moves being made on the board.

The parallels to any number of events from recent years should be obvious by now.

Take the phenomenon of false flag terror, including the 9/11 attack, which may seem confusing at first glance. How could Al Qaeda go from a USA ally during the Soviet-Afghan war to a mortal enemy in 2001 and back to an ally in the 2010s? How did a ragtag band of outcasts in Afghanistan coordinate the most sophisticated penetration of the air defenses of the world’s largest superpower not once or twice but four times on a single day? Why did America’s defenses seemingly stand down despite numerous indicators that an attack was being prepared?

Once again, what seems baffling from the 2D point of view makes sense if we think from a three-dimensional perspective, understanding that hidden forces (a “deep state,” if you will) were able to control elements of both the American government and the Al Qaeda threat.

Or take the neo-Cold War that is shaping up between China and the US. If China is a mortal threat to the US and its allies, why have they spent the last three decades consciously building up China’s manufacturing base and technological capabilities? Why have they assisted China in its rise as an economic and geopolitical power? Why have they provided the military technologies that are now being touted as an existential threat and a reason for (yet another) arms buildup?

Here yet again we find that the traditional 2D explanation of the “Team USA” vs. “Team China” chess match falls short, whereas an understanding that there are 3D players manipulating both teams for their own ends solves many of these seemingly insoluble puzzles.

But if the 2D game is a manipulated contest that is being played out to distract the public from the real game, we are confronted with two fundamental questions: who are these hidden players and what is the end goal of their 3D chess match?

The Endgame

The “real” chess game, then, is not the one we see taking place on the 2D board. It is the 3D chess game that encompasses the 2D game and all the other levels where the deep state(s) are operating. But there’s something else that we haven’t considered yet: what is the goal of these 3D chess masters? How does one win a game of 3D chess?

If we consider each of the conflicts that we have examined thus far (the Cold War, 9/11, the neo-Cold War with China) and many more that we could examine (WWI or WWII or the OKC bombing or big oil environmentalism or the corona crisis or . . . ) as separate “chess matches,” we could work out in each case who the 2D players are, what their goals might be, and how that game is manipulated by 3D players. In some sense, this is the task that I have been engaged in for 14 years here at The Corbett Report.

But to cut to the chase, one would be hard-pressed to state the nature of the 3D game that is being played here any more succinctly than Antony Sutton. When asked to explain why, precisely, the Wall Street interests and other 3D chess players would want to build up the Soviet threat during the Cold War, Sutton stated:

“Why? You won’t find this in the text books. Why is to bring about, I suspect, a plan to control world society in which you and I won’t find the freedoms to believe and think and do as we believe.”

This is it in a nutshell. The wealthy interests do not consider themselves a member of “Team USA” or “Team China” or any of the other two-dimensional constructs that the public has been taught to identify with. Instead, they are wielding their considerable wealth and power to bring about a truly global system of control. That system is not predicated on “Team USA” conquering the chess board, or “Team China” conquering the chess board, or any other final position that we would identify as the end of the two-dimensional chess game. The goal of their 3D game is to control the entire board. Every square. Every piece. All of it. To be able to completely dictate what happens on that board at all times.

Note that if this is indeed the goal of the three-dimensional chess game, then it doesn’t matter if the “white team” ever actually beats the “black team” or vice versa. In fact, it might be in the interest of the 3D chess masters to keep the 2D game going forever, as a way to distract everyone from the fact that the entire 2D board itself has been taken over by unseen players. This is the vision of Nineteen Eighty-Four, for example, where the world is seemingly divided into three super-states (Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia) that are constantly shifting between permutations of enemy and ally. In the end, not even Outer Party members like Winston Smith know if these enemies really exist, or if they are all part of a single totalitarian government, or if the bombs raining down on Oceania are in fact being dropped by the Oceanian government as a way of keeping its own people in fear.

In chess, the “endgame” refers to the final stage of a chess match, when only a few pieces remain on the board and one player is closing in on a checkmate of his opponent. If the quest for world government is the real goal of these 3D chess players, then is it possible to deny that we are in the end game of this match?

Seemingly every nation in the world has marched in lock-step with the erection of the biosecurity state, showing that once-neglected bodies like the World Health Organization wield—through the International Health Regulations and other treaties carefully laid out over the course of the past few decades—enormous power over the seemingly sovereign governments that subscribe to them.

The World Economic Forum is busy preparing the public via The Great Reset for the coming Fourth Industrial Revolution and the plunge into the transhuman dystopia.

The drive for a global tax grid has just come one step closer to reality thanks to ex-Fed chair and current US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Surely the drive for truly global control of the human population has never been more eminent or more imminent.

But if we are indeed in the end game for this quest for total control of the grand chessboard, what comes next? 

Checkmate?

If we extend the 3D chess analogy to its logical conclusion, we finally understand that the real game is not a match between “Team USA” vs. “Team China” or “Team Good Guys” vs. “Team Terrorist” or any other such simplistic, two-dimensional conflict. It is instead a game pitting the largely unseen 3D chess players against the rest of humanity. And, given the technology for altering populations at the genomic level that are coming into view, if we lose this match, we stand to lose our humanity altogether.

In chess, one player “checkmates” the other by driving his opponent’s king into a position from which he cannot move without being attacked. But this is not the only way that a chess match can end. A stalemate or other type of draw can result when neither side is able to successfully checkmate the other. Games can also end when one player, realizing that he cannot escape an eventual checkmate, resigns the match.

But none of these outcomes are acceptable in this game of 3D chess.

A checkmate, representing the victory of one 2D side over another, merely leads to the formation of a new order and the beginning of a new 2D game. If we imagined World War II as a match between “Team Axis” and “Team Allies,” for example, then the victory of Team Allies in 1945 only set the board for a new match. That match, the Cold War, was—as we have already seen—just another 2D contest manipulated and controlled by the 3D forces.

Likewise, a draw is no victory for those interested in actually defeating their 3D opponents. A stalemate on the traditional 2D chess board only prolongs the game, or invites yet another reset of the board. And, as noted above, the 3D players do not care if the 2D game ever finishes. They can gain control of the board regardless of whether the 2D game is still in play or not.

A resignation is obviously not acceptable. We can just give up, eke out what existence we can as the bars of the prison planet close around us, and leave humanity to rot. But if you were inclined to resign, you wouldn’t be here reading these words in the first place.

No, the answer to how to win this 2D chess match against the 3D players is clearly not to be found within the confines and the rules of the 2D chess match at all. In fact, at this point it should be apparent that there is no way to win this rigged, manipulated game at all. The 3D players have an unreasonably fair advantage and, although we can garner glimpses of the 3D team and the pieces at their disposal, a wall of classification and secrecy still shrouds their movements to the point where we can only infer or guess at their abilities to influence the 2D board.

Finally, we are ready to ask the most important question of all: why are we playing this rigged game in the first place? Why are we investing our time, our energy, our resources, our very lives on a rigged game where manipulated teams are playing meaningless contests against fictitious enemies, all the while being manipulated by unseen forces? Why does Joe Sixpack or Sayuri Sumomom or Vladimir Vodkadrinker or Frederico Footballer care what “Team USA” or “Team Japan” or “Team Russia” or “Team Italy” or any of these other 2D chess teams are doing on what we are constantly told is “a grand chessboard?”

What if there is no chessboard? What if there are only people, interacting with each other as they see fit? As human beings. Not engaged in some struggle for control of this or that square of some fictitious playing field, but trying to create a better world for themselves and their family?

What if we removed our participation from the game? What if we started to build our own economy separate from the one that has been erected around us, one in which free human beings interact in voluntary exchange with anyone they want, regardless of what “square” on the chessboard they hail from or what “team” they supposedly “belong” to?

What if we refused to be pawns in the game of the would-be chess masters? The problem of playing 2D chess against the unseen 3D chess masters is solved when we stop playing their silly game at all.

As has been observed before: Sometimes the only winning move is not to play.


~via Minds.com