DEAN HENDERSON: “The Illuminati War On Your Soul”

April 23, 2019

This morning ISIS claimed responsibility for the Easter Sunday bombings at St. Anthony’s and other Christian churches and hotels in Sri Lanka which claimed 321 lives. While the mainstream media is spinning a yarn that this is retaliation for the March attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand which left 49 dead, the truth is that the same Satanic bloodline oligarchs are responsible for both atrocities.

The Luciferian Illuminati cartel owners who lord over the world’s people and resources as self-proclaimed gods now own all major political factions and continue to concentrate their hold over all the world’s wealth.

This accomplished, and fearful of the growing ranks of what Gore Vidal, in a rebuttal to the CIA-coined phrase “conspiracy theorist”, called “observers of conspiracies”; their Freemason/Muslim Brotherhood/Cabala operatives are hosting a coming out party for their feudal bosses. The primary tenant of this demonic fiesta is to convince us that we do not have a soul.

The New Zealand mosque attacks were followed by a mysterious fire at the 850-year-old Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris last week. While the mainstream media focused on events in Paris, at the exact same time a fire broke out at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. If you believe this was coincidental, I have some overpriced swampland that may interest you.

On March 30th a California man was arrested after he made assassination threats through the mail to the head of First Baptist Church in Dallas, “in the name of Allah”. On April 18th, New Jersey a man was caught carrying arson materials into New York’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

On February 19th, ISIS attacked a Russian Orthodox church in Dagestan, killing five women. In 2015 the group had launched a “Caucasian province” in the region. This coincided with the Illuminati ratcheting up their anti-Russian propaganda, which has as much to do with the upsurge of the Russian Orthodox Church as it does with Putin’s Syria line in the sand. While Westerners are being told to hate religion, Russians have become more religious.

In 1973, Prof. Samuel Huntington published a Trilateral Commission paper titled, “The Coming Clash of Civilizations”. The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller to broadcast the intentions of the feudal lords.

In the 1850’s, the founder of Freemasonry in the US Albert Pike — who also founded the Ku Klux Klan and was instrumental in the Native American genocide — wrote a letter to fellow Mason and Mafia founder Guiseppe Mazzini in which he talked of three world wars. The first two came to pass and followed perfectly the description in Pike’s letter. The third was to be a religious war, pitting Muslims against Christians.

Both Pike’s “prophecy” and Huntington’s “thesis” were catapulted forward by 911. A series of Islamist groups from al Qaeda to ISIS to Boko Haram to Al Shabab were trained by the Illuminati’s intelligence agencies — MI6, CIA and Mossad — to justify various oligarch resource grabs. It was not the first time Western intelligence had used Islamic extremists to create pretexts which furthered their agenda of global control.

This string of recent attacks on Muslim mosques and Christian churches signals a desire on the part of the feudal bankers to initiate WWIII, which will likely start with conflict between Israel and Iran. But there is a deeper and more disturbing reason for these attacks.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines feudalism as, “the system of political organization prevailing in Europe from the 9th to about the 15th centuries having as its basis the relation of lord to vassal with all land held in fee and as chief characteristics homage, the service of tenants under arms and in court, wardship”.

But this system didn’t come to a screeching halt in the 15th Century. The Illuminati simply became more sophisticated in their enslavement methodologies. The Black Venetian bloodlines who financed the Roman Empire settled into Northern Italy and the Benelux nations while running their maritime law plantations from the City of London, their banking interests from Switzerland, and their military operations from the United States.

These bloodline families are Satanic. They hate God, despise humanity and natural law, and do not believe living creatures have a soul. With the 5G mind control matrix now being rolled out, these oligarchs must destroy all vestiges of spirituality and religion from the soon to be either culled or enslaved populace. Thus the Crown’s British Telecom wing rolling out of the Soul Catcher chip.

These disgusting inbreds know that those who believe in a higher God will be immune from the coming 5G electronic feudalism. As they emerge from the shadows and reveal their fascist agenda, attacks on churches, mosques and synagogues will increase.

They know that if enough people believe in God, their amateur attempts to become gods of this earth will be laid to waste and their power over humanity with crumble in the dust. Rejoice believers, for that day is near.

 

~via DavidIcke.com

Advertisements

JOSH SIGURDSON (World Alternative Media): “QAnon DESTROYED By David Icke — Exposing Faceless Movements & Distractions”

 

Josh Sigurdson sits down with David Icke, world famous researcher and theorist to talk about the absurdity of QAnon, an obvious psyop meant to distract people and keep them apathetic to Trump regardless of what he does. The idea is that everyone should “trust the plan” and lay back. No one should take action because some so-called “white hats” are working behind the scenes to save them.

Now we know here at WAM that we won’t win any points by making this video, but this is about consistency and not allowing the populace to be distracted by faceless movements there to confuse people and misdirect millions of people.

David Icke also breaks down his thoughts on the recent coup in Venezuela as Trump declares Juan Guaido the “legitimate” president of the country as Maduro ends whatever relationship remained with the United States.

David Icke talks about the history of movements meant to distract, divide and destroy.

 

~via https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCLdZo0Mkh_z2IQZSmD8Iy0Q/videos

KRISTAN HARRIS: “25 Rules Of Disinformation, Propaganda, PsyOps, Debunking Techniques”

8bf3cfc0c6a0be31983c4a8a87bb7d74.jpg

 

1.  Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2.  Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3.  Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors.” If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4.  Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviants”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6.  Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain critical reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7.  Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8.  Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows,” and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9.  Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10.  Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11.  Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminality which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12.  Enigmas that have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13.  Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14.  Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15.  Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16.  Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17.  Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18.  Emotionalize, antagonize, and goad opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism.”

19.  Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20.  False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21.  Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can ensure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22.  Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23.  Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24.  Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25.  Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

 

 

 

~via ActivistPost.com