DERRICK BROZE: “Another New Study Points to the Dangers of Geoengineering the Climate”

“Geoengineering is a field of research investigating methods to deliberately manipulate the climate in an attempt to fight climate change. Coincidentally, this dangerous science has been funded in part by none other than Bill Gates. Prominent geoengineering researcher Ken Caldeira says he receives $375,000 a year from Gates and works for Intellectual Ventures, a private geoengineering research company part-owned by Gates and run by Nathan Myhrvold, former head of technology at Microsoft. If this field of research poses such a grave danger to the planet why are technocrats like Bill Gates funding these efforts? Are these efforts related to Gates’ eugenics agenda? We leave that determination up to the reader.”

~Derrick Broze

 

A new study from Massachusetts Institute of Technology is adding to the growing list of concerns around the controversial science of geoengineering. Researchers have found that geoengineering techniques could significantly change extratropical storms and introduce changes to the climate.

Geoengineering is a field of research investigating methods to deliberately manipulate the climate in an attempt to fight climate change. One of these methods is known as solar radiation management (SRM). Proposals for SRM suggest that scientists might be able to replicate the results seen from volcano eruptions. MIT reports:

“How can the world combat the continued rise in global temperatures? How about shading the Earth from a portion of the sun’s heat by injecting the stratosphere with reflective aerosols? After all, volcanoes do essentially the same thing, albeit in short, dramatic bursts: When a Vesuvius erupts, it blasts fine ash into the atmosphere, where the particles can linger as a kind of cloud cover, reflecting solar radiation back into space and temporarily cooling the planet.”

Researchers have proposed using planes, balloons, or blimps to spray various aerosols into the atmosphere in the hopes of reflecting sunlight and cooling the planet. This type of geoengineering is extremely controversial and previous studies have linked the technology to potentially dangerous outcomes for various parts of the planet.

Now a research team lead by Charles Gertler, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS), has found that “solar geoengineering will not simply reverse climate change. Instead, it has the potential itself to induce novel changes in climate.” Gertler and his team have published the results in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Specifically, Gertler’s team found that solar geoengineering could alter what are known as extratropical storm tracks. MIT describes storm tracks as “the zones in the middle and high latitudes where storms form year-round and are steered by the jet stream across the oceans and land.” These storm tracks help create extratropical cyclones, and the strength of the storm tracks determine the severity and frequency of storms known as “nor’easters.” A nor’easter is a storm along the East Coast of North America in which the winds over the coastal area are typically from the northeast.

The researchers used a scenario of solar geoengineering known to climate scientists as experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). This project provides various geoengineering scenarios for scientists to run to determine various climate effects. G1 assumes an ideal scenario in which geoengineering blocks enough solar radiation to act as a counterbalance with the warming that would occur if carbon dioxide concentration quadruples.

The team found that the strength of storm tracks in both the northern and southern hemispheres weakened significantly in response to geoengineering. This would mean less powerful storms in the winter, but the researchers say the weaker storm tracks could “lead to stagnant conditions, particularly in summer, and less wind to clear away air pollution.” These changes in wind could also affect circulation of ocean water and the stability of ice sheets.

“A weakened storm track, in both hemispheres, would mean weaker winter storms but also lead to more stagnant weather, which could affect heat waves,” Gertler says. “Across all seasons, this could affect ventilation of air pollution. It also may contribute to a weakening of the hydrological cycle, with regional reductions in rainfall. These are not good changes, compared to a baseline climate that we are used to.”

Gertler further stated that his work indicates that “solar geoengineering is not reversing climate change, but is substituting one unprecedented climate state for another.” In the conclusion to their study the researchers note that “there likely exist other consequences of solar geoengineering that the simulations studied here are unable to simulate.”

Previous Studies Also Show Danger

The concerns surrounding geoengineering are widely known to anyone following the research. Claims that geoengineering could be employed without significantly altering the planet or without making things worse were rebuffed by a number of experts.

Alan Robock, a climate and aerosols expert at Rutgers University who previously conducted research for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has said that researchers claiming that there will be no significant effect do not take into account the reality that geoengineering may have additional side effects, like warming certain parts of the atmosphere, changing atmospheric circulation, or affecting the ozone layer.

“I do not agree that ’no area will be significantly worse off under a solar geo-engineering scenario’,” Robock has said. “Worse as compared to what? If we rapidly begin mitigation now, that is rapidly reduce our CO2 emissions to zero by switching our power to wind and solar, we will be much better off than a business-as-usual future, or one with geoengineering.”

Interestingly, Robock has previously stated that he believes the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) may already be using geoengineering techniques as a weapon of war. In 2015, while speaking at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Jose, California, Robock stated he was phoned by two men claiming to be from the CIA, asking whether or not it was possible for hostile governments to use geoengineering, or mass manipulation of the weather, against the United States.

The public and scientific community should examine all of the available evidence which currently shows geoengineering might lead to potential loss of blue skies, lower crop yields, and increases in land and water temperature.

According to a study published in Nature, geoengineering could lead to lower crop yields. This study is not the first to point out the dangers of beginning geoengineering programs. According to a 2013 study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then suddenly halted, the planet could see an immediate rise in temperatures, particularly over land.

Another study published in February 2015 by an international committee of scientists stated that geoengineering techniques are not a viable alternative to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat the effects of climate change. The committee report called for further research and understanding of various geoengineering techniques, including carbon dioxide removal schemes and solar-radiation management (SRM), before implementation. The scientists found that SRM techniques are likely to present “serious known and possible unknown environmental, social, and political risks, including the possibility of being deployed unilaterally.”

In October 2018, the United Nations IPCC issued a report that essentially called for climate engineering as the “last ditch” option to save humanity from environmental disaster. This option is one step closer to reality now that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is scheduled to receive $4 million in funding. The more geoengineering becomes a reality the more that calls are being made for a global governance framework to guide these programs. It’s becoming apparent that calls for geoengineering will serve as a gateway to global government.

Coincidentally, this dangerous science has been funded in part by none other than Bill Gates. As TLAV previously reported, since 2007 Gates had given $4.5 million to study geoengineering methods for altering the stratosphere to reflect solar energy, techniques to filter carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, and brightening ocean clouds. Geoengineering is the deliberate mass scale manipulation of the weather for the stated purpose of reducing heating on the planet.

The Guardian previously noted that Gates gives “an undisclosed sum” to geoengineering proponent and Harvard professor David Keith. Gates also owns majority stake in Keith’s geoengineering company, Carbon Engineering. Prominent geoengineering researcher Ken Caldeira says he receives $375,000 a year from Gates and works for Intellectual Ventures, a private geoengineering research company part-owned by Gates and run by Nathan Myhrvold, former head of technology at Microsoft.

If this field of research poses such a grave danger to the planet why are technocrats like Bill Gates funding these efforts? Are these efforts related to Gates’ eugenics agenda? We leave that determination up to the reader.

 

Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.

 

See source article for reference links

 

~via The Last American Vagabond

‘DONALD TRUMP: EXCELLENT TOOL FOR THE CABAL’ ~ Denisa Adamus on “How Zionism Wove its Way Behind Russia & Trump”

“Trump has deep ties to his Black Nobility and Zionist handlers. On one side, they are promoting left with its ridiculous ‘woke’ ideology like extreme liberalism and transgenderism. On the other hand, they are promoting Trump as the savior to the right wing alternative population. It was easy for the Jesuits to convince the Rothschilds to promote hate of Trump through the Rothschild controlled mass media. Then it was even easier for the Jesuits to convince most of the alternative population that Trump must be the good guy if the media hate him so much. In most cases, Trump is only following his emotional impulses or directives of his handlers and is thus an excellent tool for the Cabal.”

~Denisa Adamus

 

 

Regarding the presidential election in 2016 Trump was not expected to win. But as with all serious political candidates behind the scenes meetings explore the “what if I win and what to expect” with all the major political powers on the planet. The hacking of the DNC and HRC servers was most likely done by Americans themselves. There was much anger by many Americans for what was obvious that the DNC was pushing Sanders out of the 2016 election in favor of HRC. The Jesuits want a civil war in the USA to consolidate their power and wish to polarize the population as much as possible, that is why they have allowed the election of Donald Trump.

The Archon Black Nobility families are using Trump to artificially polarize the public into the left/right paradigm and to focus them away from the real source of the problem. Trump is being partially controlled by his Jesuit/SMOM/Gaetani handlers.

On one side, they are promoting left with its ridiculous “woke” ideology like extreme liberalism and transgenderism.

On the other hand, they are promoting Trump as the savior to the right wing alternative population. It was easy for the Jesuits to convince the Rothschilds to promote hate of Trump through the Rothschild controlled mass media. Then it was even easier for the Jesuits to convince most of the alternative population that Trump must be the good guy if the media hate him so much.

Trump has deep ties to his Black Nobility and Zionist handlers. Donald Trump has Steven Mnuchin and had Gary Cohn, Steve Bannon, Anthony Scaramucci, and Dina Powell in his Administration and they were all top executives for Goldman Sachs. The Goldman and Sachs families were from Bavaria (Bavarian Illuminati). The Trump bloodline is from Bavaria. Ivana Trump was accompanied by Prince Manuel of Bavaria and Princess Anna of Bavaria for the Benefit Auction for the Jazz Musicians Emergency Fund in 2005. Trump had a meeting with the Bavarian Henry Kissinger who wrote the National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 a report on population control.

Trump appointed Jared Kushner as a senior adviser and his company RealCadre LLC was financed by George Soros and Goldman Sachs. Jared Kushner is also a Kabbalist Chabad member. Goldman Sachs Commits $250 Million in Client Money to Real Estate Startup Cadre Stephen A. Schwarzman chaired for Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum and the billionaire and Skull and Bones member Schwarzman founded Blackstone.

Trump and Kushner met with the Saudis and sold them hundreds of millions worth of missiles as part of a billion-dollar contract and then the Saudis increased their bombings and missile strikes on Yemen. After their meeting, the Saudis invested 40 million into Blackstone as the beginning of their multi-billion dollar investment.

Trump’s infrastructure push is cited by Saudis as they make a huge commitment toward Blackstone’s $40 billion goal and his administration approves $1B arms sale to Saudi Arabia, including more than 6,500 missiles.

The speculation for the discord caused by the Democratic party about the Trump/Putin connection is for one of two possible reasons. The first is that the Democrats and the MIC want war with Russia or they want to be the ones getting credit for finding the solutions and agreements with getting along with Russia.

The 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement and also petrodollar systems have failed. Everyone knows this except the common person. Until the world agrees to and promotes a new system any American president is going to have to do what they can to stabilize the American way of life, even as dysfunctional as it is. In most cases, Trump is only following his emotional impulses or directives of his handlers and is thus an excellent tool for the Cabal. However, he is also time to time listening to the guidance of the Positive Military Intelligence. Because of this fact, Positive Military Intelligence decided to tactically stroke his ego by encouraging Trump worship in alternative media through QAnon and other alternative channels, as opposed to Trump criticism in the Rothschild controlled mainstream media. This makes Trump more willing to follow the suggestions of Positive Military Intelligence.

It is important to try to keep the balance of power until the world makes the change. If too many changes without the support of a new financial system, chaos, and destruction will happen before anything positive can be constructed.

 

Read the full article here:

How Zionism Wove its Way Behind Russia and Trump